Brussels		Antwerp		Ghent		Liège		Mons
	LT*	LC	LT*	LC	LT*	LC	LT*	LC	LT*	LC
TotD	865	210	642	163	261	94	187	32	126	11
D=F	34%	25%	51%	34%	38%	46%	32%	34%	37%	27%
D>F	20%	39%	41%	57%	18%	19%	35%	38%	37%	55%
D1>F	61%	49%	78%	70%	75%	78%	69%	75%	83%	83%
D2>F	20%	23%	14%	20%	13%	17%	14%	8%	9%	17%
D+>F	18%	27%	8%	10%	13%	6%	17%	17%	9%	0%
D<F	46%	36%	8%	9%	44%	35%	33%	28%	26%	18%
D1<F	49%	43%	67%	47%	58%	61%	66%	56%	61%	0%
D2<F	25%	29%	18%	20%	23%	24%	19%	0%	0%	50%
D+<F	26%	28%	14%	33%	18%	15%	15%	44%	18%	50%
D=ML	13%	10%	4%	4%	16%	13%	8%	0%	1%	0%
D1>ML	14%	7%	12%	7%	15%	13%	11%	13%	10%	18%
D2>ML	15%	11%	18%	13%	18%	15%	17%	19%	13%	0%

* All LT from this district - see table below.

LT district Antwerp:	Antwerp, Hasselt, Malines, Tongres, Turnhout
LT district Brussels:	Brussels, Leuven, Nivelles
LT district Ghent:	Alost, Bruges, Termonde, Ghent, Ypres, Courtrai, Oudenaarde, Saint-Nicolas, Fouronne
LT district Liège:	Dinant, Eupen, Huy, Liège, Namur, Neufchâteau, Marche-en-Famenne, Verviers
LT district Mons:	Mons, Charleroi, Tournai, Mouscron

Legend

Code	Description	Relation
LT	Labour tribunal(s)
LC	Labour court(s)
D	Decisions from a Labour jurisdiction	% compared to total number of decisions
F	Formula (version 2004)
DSC	Decisions following the rejection of a serious cause	% compared to total number of decisions
DWSC	Decisions without a serious cause	% compared to total number of decisions
R	Remuneration
TotD	Total number of decisions
Comparison between the case law and the formula (version 2004)
D=F	% of decisions identical to the result of the formula 2004	% compared to total number of decisions
D>F	% of decisions giving more than the formula 2004	% compared to total number of decisions
D1>F	% of decisions giving one month more than the formula 2004	% compared to total number of decisions giving more than the result of the formula 2004
D2>F	% of decisions giving two months more than the formula 2004	% compared to total number of decisions giving more than the result of the formula 2004
D+>F	% of decisions giving more than two months more than the formula 2004	% compared to total number of decisions giving more than the result of the formula 2004
D<F	% of decisions giving less than the result of the formula 2004	% compared to total number of decisions
D1<F	% of decisions giving one month less than the formula 2004	% compared to total number of decisions giving less than the result of the formula 2004
D2<F	% of decisions giving two months less than the formula 2004	% compared to total number of decisions giving less than the result of the formula 2004
D+<F	% of decisions giving more than two months less than the formula 2004	% compared to total number of decisions giving less than the result of the formula 2004
D1<>F	% of decisions identical to the result of the formula 2004 or deviating by one month (more or less)	% compared to total number of decisions
D2<>F	% of decisions identical to the result of the formula 2004 or deviating by two months (more or less)	% compared to total number of decisions
Comparison between the case law and the legal minimum
D=ML	% of decisions equal to the legal minimum	% compared to total number of decisions
D1>ML	% of decisions giving one month more than the legal minimum	% compared to total number of decisions
D2>ML	% of decisions giving two months more than the legal minimum	% compared to total number of decisions
F=ML	% of decisions where result of the formula 2004 equals the legal minimum	% compared to total number of decisions

For ease of reading the percentages in these tables have been rounded (decimals from 0 to 4 have been rounded to the inferior unit; decimals from 5 to 9 have been rounded to the superior unit). This explains some "irregularity" that may appear with the percentages.