Predictability

 

All

LT and LC

All

LT and LC

in Flanders

All

LT and LC

in Brussels

All

LT and LC

in Wallonie

TotD

2.591

1.244

948

399

D=F

38%

43%

34%

35%

D>F

31%

34%

25%

35%

D1>F

70%

76%

55%

77%

D2>F

17%

15%

23%

11%

D+>F

13%

9%

22%

13%

D<F

31%

23%

41%

30%

D1<F

53%

51%

53%

60%

D2<F

24%

23%

26%

20%

D+<F

23%

26%

22%

20%

D1<>F

76%

81%

69%

80%

D2<>F

89%

91%

85%

89%

 

 

LT 
Antwerp

LT Brussels (D)

LT Brussels (F)

LT
Liège

LT
Leuven

TotD

453

386

353

115

84

D=F

51%

38%

34%

36%

11%

D>F

44%

22%

21%

37%

5%

D1>F

78%

57%

61%

64%

100%

D2>F

14%

24%

20%

19%

0%

D+>F

8%

20%

19%

17%

0%

D<F

5%

41%

44%

28%

85%

D1<F

73%

52%

57%

63%

24%

D2<F

14%

22%

28%

19%

25%

D+<F

14%

26%

15%

19%

51%

 

 

LT Ghent

LT Turnhout

LT Charleroi

(incl. Binche)

LT
Courtrai

(incl. Roeselare)

LT Malines

TotD

78

78

72

60

58

D=F

32%

56%

38%

47%

47%

D>F

22%

37%

35%

13%

47%

D1>F

65%

76%

80%

88%

78%

D2>F

24%

14%

8%

0%

19%

D+>F

12%

10%

12%

13%

4%

D<F

46%

6%

28%

40%

7%

D1<F

56%

80%

55%

67%

50%

D2<F

19%

0%

30%

17%

25%

D+<F

25%

20%

15%

17%

25%

 

 

LT Nivelles

LT Hasselt

LT Namur

LT Mons

TotD

43

36

36

34

D=F

42%

67%

36%

38%

D>F

28%

25%

31%

29%

D1>F

92%

78%

91%

80%

D2>F

0%

11%

0%

10%

D+>F

8%

11%

9%

10%

D<F

30%

8%

33%

32%

D1<F

38%

67%

92%

82%

D2<F

31%

0%

8%

9%

D+<F

31%

33%

0%

9%

 

Legend

 

Code

Description

Relation

LT

Labour tribunal(s)

 

LC

Labour court(s)

 

D

Decisions from a Labour jurisdiction

% compared to total number of decisions

F

Formula (version 2004)

 

DSC

Decisions following the rejection of a serious cause

% compared to total number of decisions

DWSC

Decisions without a serious cause

% compared to total number of decisions

R

Remuneration

 

TotD

Total number of decisions

 

 

Comparison between the case law and the formula (version 2004)

D=F

% of decisions identical to the result of the formula 2004

% compared to total number of decisions

D>F

% of decisions giving more than the formula 2004

% compared to total number of decisions

D1>F

% of decisions giving one month more than the formula 2004

% compared to total number of decisions giving more than the result of the formula 2004

D2>F

% of decisions giving two months more than the formula 2004

% compared to total number of decisions giving more than the result of the formula 2004

D+>F

% of decisions giving more than two months more than the formula 2004

% compared to total number of decisions giving more than the result of the formula 2004

D<F

% of decisions giving less than the result of the formula 2004

% compared to total number of decisions

D1<F

% of decisions giving one month less than the formula 2004

% compared to total number of decisions giving less than the result of the formula 2004

D2<F

% of decisions giving two months less than the formula 2004

% compared to total number of decisions giving less than the result of the formula 2004

D+<F

% of decisions giving more than two months less than the formula 2004

% compared to total number of decisions giving less than the result of the formula 2004

D1<>F

% of decisions identical to the result of the formula 2004 or deviating by one month (more or less)

% compared to total number of decisions

D2<>F

% of decisions identical to the result of the formula 2004 or deviating by two months (more or less)

% compared to total number of decisions

 

Comparison between the case law and the legal minimum

D=ML

% of decisions equal to the legal minimum

% compared to total number of decisions

D1>ML

% of decisions giving one month more than the legal minimum

% compared to total number of decisions

D2>ML

% of decisions giving two months more than the legal minimum

% compared to total number of decisions

F=ML

% of decisions where result of the formula 2004 equals the legal minimum

% compared to total number of decisions

 

For ease of reading the percentages in these tables have been rounded (decimals from 0 to 4 have been rounded to the inferior unit; decimals from 5 to 9 have been rounded to the superior unit). This explains some "irregularity" that may appear with the percentages.